Elon Musk’s ex Ashley St. Clair is raising an explosive new question about the 2024 election: Why did Musk seem so certain Donald Trump was going to win before the votes were counted?

BREAKING: MUSK’S EX SHOWS RECEIPTS ON ELECTION BOMBSHELL! “Elon had a bizarre degree of certainty” Trump would win BEFORE the results came in – and a new documentary reveals his cryptic texts about an “ANOMALY IN THE MATRIX!” Elon Musk’s ex Ashley St. Clair is raising an explosive new question about the 2024 election: Why […]

BREAKING: MUSK’S EX SHOWS RECEIPTS ON ELECTION BOMBSHELL! “Elon had a bizarre degree of certainty” Trump would win BEFORE the results came in – and a new documentary reveals his cryptic texts about an “ANOMALY IN THE MATRIX!”

Elon Musk’s ex Ashley St. Clair is raising an explosive new question about the 2024 election: Why did Musk seem so certain Donald Trump was going to win before the votes were counted?

The allegation isn’t entirely new. But acclaimed documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney is putting it back under a spotlight in his forthcoming film, Musk – and reportedly showing viewers the private text messages behind St. Clair’s story.

St. Clair, who has a child with Musk, says his confidence before the election was unlike anything she had seen from him before.

“He had told me he was going to unleash the ‘anomaly in the matrix,’” St. Clair says in the documentary

Then things get even stranger. Gibney’s film displays the actual text exchange between St. Clair and Musk onscreen. In it, Musk writes:
“I have ten thousand lasers in space.”

Gibney asks St. Clair off camera whether Musk was talking about Starlink

“I mean, I don’t know where else he has space lasers,” she replies.
The film doesn’t provide evidence presented here that Musk used Starlink to manipulate votes, secretly knew the results or interfered with vote counting. “Anomaly in the matrix” could mean lots of things, and Musk’s cryptic reference to “lasers” doesn’t establish what he was talking about.

But St. Clair isn’t some random internet sleuth trying to decode Musk’s posts after the fact. She knew him intimately, had a child with him, and says she witnessed something unusual before Election Day – a “degree of certainty” about the outcome that she “had never seen before.”

Musk wasn’t exactly a spectator in that election, either. He poured more than $290 million into Trump’s campaign effort, hosted events in swing states and built an enormous political operation around electing Trump. He had a vested interest in the outcome, to say the least.

None of that proves anything nefarious. But Gibney’s documentary gives St. Clair’s allegation something it didn’t previously have in quite this form: viewers can see the private exchange for themselves.

Maybe Musk’s cryptic boasts were just the ketamine talking.  😉

But a man spending hundreds of millions to elect Trump privately predicting an “anomaly in the matrix” – while displaying a degree of certainty about the outcome that stunned someone who knew him intimately – is one hell of a coincidence.

And we’d very much like him to answer for it.